[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQdOox3XQnKVwefaT6p1rp=xEq1Ki4uD63nvwrjLCnVkZPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:15:37 +0800
From: henry martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Peter Chiu <chui-hao.chiu@...iatek.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rex Lu <rex.lu@...iatek.com>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: mt7996: Fix null-ptr-deref in mt7996_mmio_wed_init()
Ok, I will correct them in V2.
Regards,
Henry
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> 于2025年4月3日周四 18:13写道:
>
> …
> > Add NULL check after devm_ioremap() to prevent this issue.
>
> Can a summary phrase like “Prevent null pointer dereference in mt7996_mmio_wed_init()”
> be a bit nicer?
>
>
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mmio.c
> > @@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ int mt7996_mmio_wed_init(struct mt7996_dev *dev, void *pdev_ptr,
> > wed->wlan.base = devm_ioremap(dev->mt76.dev,
> > pci_resource_start(pci_dev, 0),
> > pci_resource_len(pci_dev, 0));
> > + if (!wed->wlan.base)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Can a blank line be desirable after such a statement?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists