[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_UWDSQuD7ZCfhr6@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:26:53 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 44/67] iommu/amd: KVM: SVM: Infer IsRun from validity of
pCPU destination
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 12:38:59PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> @@ -3974,8 +3974,10 @@ int amd_iommu_update_ga(int cpu, bool is_run, void *data)
> APICID_TO_IRTE_DEST_LO(cpu);
> entry->hi.fields.destination =
> APICID_TO_IRTE_DEST_HI(cpu);
> + entry->lo.fields_vapic.is_run = true;
> + } else {
> + entry->lo.fields_vapic.is_run = false;
> }
> - entry->lo.fields_vapic.is_run = is_run;
This change in the calling convention deserves a comment above the
function, describing that cpu < 0 marks the CPU as not running.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists