[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84bjt6rg5z.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:34:24 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, arnd@...db.de,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, namcao@...utronix.de,
benjamin.larsson@...exis.eu, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
matt.porter@...aro.org, tim.kryger@...aro.org, markus.mayer@...aro.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250: fix panic due to PSLVERR
On 2025-04-08, Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com> wrote:
> When the PSLVERR_RESP_EN parameter is set to 1, the device generates
> an error response if an attempt is made to read an empty RBR (Receive
> Buffer Register) while the FIFO is enabled.
>
> In serial8250_do_startup(), calling serial_port_out(port, UART_LCR,
> UART_LCR_WLEN8) triggers dw8250_check_lcr(), which invokes
> dw8250_force_idle() and serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos(). The latter
> function enables the FIFO via serial_out(p, UART_FCR, p->fcr).
> Execution proceeds to the dont_test_tx_en label:
> ...
> serial_port_in(port, UART_RX);
> This satisfies the PSLVERR trigger condition.
>
> Because another CPU(e.g., using printk()) is accessing the UART (UART
> is busy), the current CPU fails the check (value & ~UART_LCR_SPAR) ==
> (lcr & ~UART_LCR_SPAR), causing it to enter dw8250_force_idle().
>
> To resolve this issue, relevant serial_port_out() operations should be
> placed in a critical section, and UART_RX data should only be read
> when the UART_LSR DR bit is set.
The UART_LSR_DR check still has a race condition if the console is in
RS485 mode and !SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX. It seems DW supports this mode
as there is code in dw8250_rs485_config() that sets DW_UART_TCR
differently for this.
In this mode, serial8250_console_write() will call the callback
->rs485_stop_tx(), which for DW is serial8250_em485_stop_tx(). And this
calls serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos().
To really close this race, all UART_RX reads would need to be under the
port lock. Most of them already are.
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists