[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d11f01f-9adc-467c-95bc-c9ff4bbf6a0f@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:08:49 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/499] 6.13.11-rc1 review
On 08.04.25 12:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.11 release.
> There are 499 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Compiling for Fedora failed:
util/stat.c: In function ‘evsel__is_alias’:
util/stat.c:565:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu__name_no_suffix_match’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
565 | return perf_pmu__name_no_suffix_match(evsel_a->pmu, evsel_b->pmu->name);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>From a *very very* quick look I wonder if it might be due to this change,
as it seems to depend on 63e287131cf0c5 ("perf pmu: Rename name matching
for no suffix or wildcard variants") [v6.15-rc1]:
> Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> perf stat: Don't merge counters purely on name
But as I said, it was just a very very quick look, so I might be totally
off track there.
HTH, Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists