[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3831073d-fcc4-46a5-bdb7-ec19702a08be@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:30:44 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_varada@...cinc.com, quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: Enable PCIe PHYs and
controllers
On 08/04/2025 15:49, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>
>
> On 4/3/2025 3:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 08:08, Manikanta Mylavarapu
>> <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/2/2025 7:50 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:57:23PM +0530, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>>>> Enable the PCIe controller and PHY nodes corresponding to RDP466.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in V6:
>>>>> - No change.
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
>>>>> index 0fd0ebe0251d..1f89530cb035 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
>>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ &dwc_1 {
>>>>> dr_mode = "host";
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +&pcie2 {
>>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie2_default_state>;
>>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + perst-gpios = <&tlmm 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No wake-gpios? Please document it in the commit message.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>>>
>>> The wake GPIO is dropped because the PCIe on the IPQ5424 doesn't support low power mode.
>>> I will document this information in the commit message and post the next version.
>>
>> If the GPIO is routed on the PCB I think it should still be described in the DT.
>>
>>
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I have confirmed with the hardware team that the wake GPIO is not routed on the PCB.
Sad. Please mention it in the commit message.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Manikanta.
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists