linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/499] 6.13.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025040818-iodine-theater-7e1f@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:17:26 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	Justin Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.13 000/499] 6.13.11-rc1 review

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:07:09AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:09 AM Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > On 08.04.25 12:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.13.11 release.
> > > There are 499 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> >
> > Compiling for Fedora failed:
> >
> > util/stat.c: In function ‘evsel__is_alias’:
> > util/stat.c:565:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu__name_no_suffix_match’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >   565 |         return perf_pmu__name_no_suffix_match(evsel_a->pmu, evsel_b->pmu->name);
> >       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > From a *very very* quick look I wonder if it might be due to this change,
> > as it seems to depend on 63e287131cf0c5 ("perf pmu: Rename name matching
> > for no suffix or wildcard variants") [v6.15-rc1]:
> >
> > > Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > >     perf stat: Don't merge counters purely on name
> >
> > But as I said, it was just a very very quick look, so I might be totally
> > off track there.
> 
> Thanks Thorsten, I repeated the failure and reverting that patch fixes
> the build. Alternatively, cherry-picking:
> 
> ```
> commit 63e287131cf0c59b026053d6d63fe271604ffa7e
> Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> Date:   Fri Jan 31 23:43:18 2025 -0800
> 
>    perf pmu: Rename name matching for no suffix or wildcard variants
> 
>    Wildcard PMU naming will match a name like pmu_1 to a PMU name like
>    pmu_10 but not to a PMU name like pmu_2 as the suffix forms part of
>    the match. No suffix matching will match pmu_10 to either pmu_1 or
>    pmu_2. Add or rename matching functions on PMU to make it clearer what
>    kind of matching is being performed.
> 
>    Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>    Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250201074320.746259-4-irogers@google.com
>    Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ```
> 
> Also fixes the build.

Now added to both queues, thanks.

greg k-h