linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] GCPS Spec Compliance Patch Set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b1abcf84-e187-468f-a05e-e634e825210c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:01:03 -0700
From: Hari Kalavakunta <kalavakunta.hari.prasad@...il.com>
To: Sam Mendoza-Jonas <sam@...dozajonas.com>, fercerpav@...il.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: npeacock@...a.com, akozlov@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] GCPS Spec Compliance Patch Set

On 4/7/2025 2:44 PM, Sam Mendoza-Jonas wrote:
> On 8/04/2025 4:19 am, kalavakunta.hari.prasad@...il.com wrote:

> 
> Looking at e.g. DSP0222 1.2.0a, you're right about the field widths, but 
> it's not particularly explicit about whether the full 64 bits is used. 
> I'd assume so, but do you see the upper bits of e.g. the packet counters 
> return expected data? Otherwise looks good.
> 
It is possible that these statistics have not been previously explored 
or utilized, which may explain why they went unnoticed. As you pointed 
out, the checksum offset within the struct is not currently being 
checked, and similarly, the returned packet sizes are also not being 
verified.