[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9be828dc-94d0-4760-a78f-e8f92d92bcbd@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:28:17 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset
On 4/8/25 11:19, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> I think it's still valuable to have it in documentation for anyone who
> wants to read more about this. As we get issues that come out of the
> woodwork I could see people punching the string into a search engine and
> then being spit at debugging.rst and we can adjust documentation to tell
> them what to do with it when it's not clear.
How would that work when the documentation:
> +31, Internal, SW sync flood event
and the string don't match:
> + if (value & BIT(31))
> + return "software sync flood event";
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists