linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.15-fixes] sched_ext: Mark SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z_Vq91-BR3dTJG1V@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:29:11 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.15-fixes] sched_ext: Mark
 SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT for deprecation

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:28:18PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:12:57AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT was only used to suppress the missing cgroup
> > weight support warnings. Now that the warnings are removed, the flag doesn't
> > do anything. Mark it for deprecation and remove its usage from scx_flatcg.
> 
> Is the removal from scx_flatcg meant to be part of this patch, or is it
> intended as a follow-up? Other than that LGTM.

Oh, sorry about that. Lemme send v2.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun