[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250408190044.GGZ_VyXCG4H25ce6cF@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:00:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 01:19:42PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Or do you mean directly in the RST itself? The RST documentation [1] said
> and I quote: "Choose whatever sucks least."
Self-contained sucks less, no?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists