linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] regulator: bd96801: Drop IC name from the IRQ resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d69800fe-56f6-4b89-bb8e-56921e059af1@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:19:59 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] regulator: bd96801: Drop IC name from the IRQ
 resources

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:45:34AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The resources generated in the BD96801 MFD driver are only visible to
> the sub-drivers whose resource fields they are added. This makes
> abbreviating the resource name with the IC name pointless. It just adds
> confusion in those sub-drivers which do not really care the exact model
> that generates the IRQ but just want to know the purpose IRQ was
> generated for. Thus, as a preparatory fix to simplify adding support for
> ROHM BD96802 PMIC the IC name "bd96801-" prefix was dropped from the IRQ
> resource names. Adapt the regulator driver to this change.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)