linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3134809c-720b-4033-9cc0-2ecc29da645e@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:09:50 -0400
From: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@....com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
 sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
 laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com,
 krzk@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com, grosikop@....com, king.li@....com,
 dantony@....com, Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vengutta@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver

Hi Bryan,

On 3/31/2025 3:17 PM, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> Thanks,
> Pratap
> 
> On 3/28/2025 9:18 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper 
>> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>
>>
>> On 28/03/2025 21:42, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:
>>> From: Bin Du <Bin.Du@....com>
>>
>>> +static const struct i2c_device_id ov05c10_id[] = {
>>> +     {"ov05c10", 0 },
>>> +     { }
>>> +};
>>
>> There's an IPU6/IPU7 version of this driver.
>>
>> https://github.com/intel/ipu6-drivers/blob/master/drivers/media/i2c/ 
>> ov05c10.c
>>
>> Perhaps you could import the Intel ACPI name contained in there too.
>>
> sure, will add Intel ACPI names too in V3. To be specific, I'm going to 
> add the below table in addition to the existing "struct i2c_device_id 
> ov05c10_id[]" table:
> 
> static const struct acpi_device_id ov05c10_acpi_ids[] = {
>      { "OVTI05C1" },
>      {}
> };
> 
I'm planning to submit v3 addressing the outstanding comments, but will 
not be including the ACPI device table for now. I  will take care of 
this in the upcoming patch based on Sakari's feedback to accomodate both 
ACPI and I2C device tables.

Thanks,
Pratap

>>> +
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ov05c10_id);
>>> +
>>> +static struct i2c_driver ov05c10_i2c_driver = {
>>> +     .driver = {
>>> +             .name = DRV_NAME,
>>> +             .pm = pm_ptr(&ov05c10_pm_ops),
>>> +     },
>>> +     .id_table = ov05c10_id,
>>> +     .probe = ov05c10_probe,
>>> +     .remove = ov05c10_remove,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +module_i2c_driver(ov05c10_i2c_driver);
>>> +
>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>");
>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vengutta@....com>");
>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bin Du <bin.du@....com>");
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("OmniVision OV05C1010 sensor driver");
>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>> Why v2 ? Checkpatch will complain about v2 and BTW the IPU6 driver above
>> is GPL not GPL v2.
>>
> sure, will replace "GPL v2" with "GPL" in V3.
> 
>> ---
>> bod
>