[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tt6zb51t.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 07:22:54 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
He Lugang <helugang@...ontech.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/11] sound: Replace deprecated PCI functions
On Tue, 08 Apr 2025 01:35:54 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:19:01 +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > pcim_iomap_table() and pcim_iomap_regions() have been deprecated by the
> > PCI subsystem. In sound/, they can easily be replaced with
> > pcim_iomap_region().
> >
> > This series was around some time in late summer last year as a single
> > patch. I lost track of it for a while, but Takashi Iwai (AFAIR)
> > requested that I split it by component.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
>
> Thanks!
>
> [11/11] ASoC: loongson: Replace deprecated PCI functions
> commit: 7288aa73e5cfb3f37ae93b55d7b7d63eca5140a8
>
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
>
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
>
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
>
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
Oh, I already applied this one blindly as a part of series to my
tree. But it's a trivial fix and shouldn't be a big problem to apply
twice...
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists