| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cbc057b9-e3ec-4750-aad4-0cc813b65b07@ghiti.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:05:48 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@....com, richard.henderson@...aro.org, jim.shu@...ive.com,
andybnac@...il.com, kito.cheng@...ive.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
atishp@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, samitolvanen@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/28] riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore
of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit
On 14/03/2025 22:39, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> Carves out space in arch specific thread struct for cfi status and shadow
> stack in usermode on riscv.
>
> This patch does following
> - defines a new structure cfi_status with status bit for cfi feature
> - defines shadow stack pointer, base and size in cfi_status structure
> - defines offsets to new member fields in thread in asm-offsets.c
> - Saves and restore shadow stack pointer on trap entry (U --> S) and exit
> (S --> U)
>
> Shadow stack save/restore is gated on feature availiblity and implemented
> using alternative. CSR can be context switched in `switch_to` as well but
> soon as kernel shadow stack support gets rolled in, shadow stack pointer
> will need to be switched at trap entry/exit point (much like `sp`). It can
> be argued that kernel using shadow stack deployment scenario may not be as
> prevalant as user mode using this feature. But even if there is some
> minimal deployment of kernel shadow stack, that means that it needs to be
> supported. And thus save/restore of shadow stack pointer in entry.S instead
> of in `switch_to.h`.
>
> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 +++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 4 ++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> index e3aba3336e63..d851bb5c6da0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/usercfi.h>
>
> #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \
> ({ \
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index f5916a70879a..a0cfe00c2ca6 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ struct thread_info {
> long user_sp; /* User stack pointer */
> int cpu;
> unsigned long syscall_work; /* SYSCALL_WORK_ flags */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> + struct cfi_status user_cfi_state;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> void *scs_base;
> void *scs_sp;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5f2027c51917
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Rivos, Inc.
> + * Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_USERCFI_H
> +#define _ASM_RISCV_USERCFI_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> +struct cfi_status {
> + unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
> + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) - 1);
> + unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */
> + unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */
> + unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_USERCFI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index e89455a6a0e5..0c188aaf3925 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
> #endif
>
> OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> + OFFSET(TASK_TI_CFI_STATUS, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state);
> + OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SSP, task_struct, thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk);
> +#endif
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
> OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F2, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[2]);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 33a5a9f2a0d4..68c99124ea55 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
>
> REG_L s0, TASK_TI_USER_SP(tp)
> csrrc s1, CSR_STATUS, t0
> + /*
> + * If previous mode was U, capture shadow stack pointer and save it away
> + * Zero CSR_SSP at the same time for sanitization.
> + */
> + ALTERNATIVE("nop; nop; nop; nop",
You could use __nops(4) here instead.
> + __stringify( \
> + andi s2, s1, SR_SPP; \
> + bnez s2, skip_ssp_save; \
> + csrrw s2, CSR_SSP, x0; \
> + REG_S s2, TASK_TI_USER_SSP(tp); \
> + skip_ssp_save:),
> + 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS,
> + CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI)
> csrr s2, CSR_EPC
> csrr s3, CSR_TVAL
> csrr s4, CSR_CAUSE
> @@ -236,6 +250,18 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(ret_from_exception)
> * structures again.
> */
> csrw CSR_SCRATCH, tp
> +
> + /*
> + * Going back to U mode, restore shadow stack pointer
> + */
> + ALTERNATIVE("nop; nop",
Ditto
> + __stringify( \
> + REG_L s3, TASK_TI_USER_SSP(tp); \
> + csrw CSR_SSP, s3),
> + 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS,
> + CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI)
> +
> 1:
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V_PREEMPTIVE
> move a0, sp
>
Apart from the nits above, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists