[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_TcD8KV-Ix9_yzK@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:19:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/mm/pat: (un)track_pfn_copy() fix + improvements
* Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Good, although why is this compiler option named so weirdly in Clang:
> >
> > CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER := -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang
> >
> > Hopefully it is named thusly because Clang has adopted GCC's
> > -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero?
>
> Clang did -ftrivial-auto-var-init first, where the original author added
> both pattern and zero but intended to remove zero once pattern has been
> optimized enough compared to zero (if I remember and understand
> correctly), so the "enabler" flag was added to try and make that clear.
> Eventually, Kees leveraged both Linus's stated desire for initializing
> stack variables [1] and GCC 12 landing -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
> without a separate enable option to deprecate the "enabler" flag in
> clang 16 [2] and remove it altogether in clang 18 [3].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wgTM+cN7zyUZacGQDv3DuuoA4LORNPWgb1Y_Z1p4iedNQ@mail.gmail.com/
> [2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aef03c9b3bed5cef5a1940774b80128aefcb4095
> [3]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00e54d04ae2802d498741097d4b83e898bc99c5b
Cool, thanks for the explanation!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists