[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250408083022.3671283-1-sheetal@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:30:22 +0000
From: "Sheetal ." <sheetal@...dia.com>
To: <broonie@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <mkumard@...dia.com>,
<spujar@...dia.com>, Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: soc-pcm: Optimize hw_params() BE DAI call
From: Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
The hw_params() function for BE DAI was being called multiple times due
to an unnecessary SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_PARAMS state check.
Remove the redundant state check to ensure hw_params() is called only once
per BE DAI configuration.
Signed-off-by: Sheetal <sheetal@...dia.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update commit message as its not a fix.
- Marked as RFC patch as it requires feedback from other users
perspective as well.
- The patch is being sent separately as other patch is not RFC.
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index d7f6d3a6d312..c73be27c4ecb 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2123,7 +2123,6 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_hw_params(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
continue;
if ((be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_OPEN) &&
- (be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_PARAMS) &&
(be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_FREE))
continue;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists