linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [perf/x86] 88ec7eedbb: kvm-unit-tests.pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <418fff05-a0d9-4ead-b344-7b0b7fdb7f7f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:13:07 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
 kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [perf/x86] 88ec7eedbb: kvm-unit-tests.pmu_lbr.fail


On 4/7/2025 10:38 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-07 1:07 a.m., kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> kernel test robot noticed "kvm-unit-tests.pmu_lbr.fail" on:
>>
>> commit: 88ec7eedbbd21cad38707620ad6c48a4e9a87c18 ("perf/x86: Fix low freqency setting issue")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>> [test failed on linus/master      0a87d6bb6fd274cde3bf217a821153714374198f]
>> [test failed on linux-next/master fefb886b1344e222b3218f3c0165b0fd770e8b88]
>>
>> in testcase: kvm-unit-tests
>> version: kvm-unit-tests-x86_64-69574079-1_20250322
>> with following parameters:
> The one line patch only impacts the perf record.
> But the test case is for LBR on KVM. The case directly access the
> IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR to enable/disable LBRs. There is nothing related.
> It is probably a false alarm.
>
> + Dapeng
>
> Could you please take a look at the qemu test case?

Sure. I would investigate it later.


>
> Thanks,
> Kan>
>> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
>> compiler: gcc-12
>> test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory
>>
>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>>
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202504071232.3c2fa7d5-lkp@intel.com
>>
>>
>> ...
>> .[32mPASS.[0m pmu (143 tests, 14 skipped)
>> .[31mFAIL.[0m pmu_lbr (2 tests, 1 unexpected failures)   <---
>> .[33mSKIP.[0m pmu_pebs (1 tests, 1 skipped)
>> ...
>>
>>
>> one log is attached.
>>
>>
>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250407/202504071232.3c2fa7d5-lkp@intel.com
>>
>>
>>