[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409144345.GG9833@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:43:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:02:12AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I decided to keep the "unsupported instruction in callable function"
> warning, it's not hurting anything. As a result we now have
> INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET.
>
> v4:
> - split up patches
> - don't get rid of "unsupported instruction in callable function" warning
> - split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH -> INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/9b23e4413873bee38961e628b0c73f6d3a26d494.1743799705.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
>
> Josh Poimboeuf (4):
> objtool: Fix INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH handling in validate_unret()
> objtool: Split INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH into INSN_SYSCALL and INSN_SYSRET
> objtool: Stop UNRET validation on UD2
> objtool, xen: Fix INSN_SYSCALL / INSN_SYSRET semantics
This looks nice, thanks for doing that. Belated:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists