[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f4adc4c-72fd-481f-8b41-f107f2b91ef8@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 17:09:08 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 3/8] slab: add sheaf support for batching
kfree_rcu() operations
On 4/9/25 3:50 AM, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> Hmm this hunk in v3 is fine, but on your slub-percpu-shaves-v4r0 branch
> it's calling local_unlock() twice. Probably a rebase error?
Yeah, thanks a lot for catching that! I've just pushed
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slub-percpu-sheaves-v4r1
with this fixed, and fixups for 2/8 to the points you made, plus a
proper strict_numa handling in 2/8, and an extra patch for better NUMA
locality
> Otherwise looks good to me.
>
> When you address this, please feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists