[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02d570de-001b-4622-b4c4-cfedf1b599a1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:56:29 +0200
From: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins
<hughd@...gle.com>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic
context
On 4/9/25 4:25 PM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:10:58PM +0200, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
> Hi Andrey,
>
>>> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static int kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
>>> if (likely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> - page = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + page = __get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> if (!page)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>
>> I think a better way to fix this would be moving out allocation from atomic context. Allocate page prior
>> to apply_to_page_range() call and pass it down to kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte().
>
> I think the page address could be passed as the parameter to kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte().
We'll need to pass it as 'struct page **page' or maybe as pointer to some struct, e.g.:
struct page_data {
struct page *page;
};
So, the kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() would do something like this:
kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() {
if (!pte_none)
return 0;
if (!page_data->page)
return -EAGAIN;
//use page to set pte
//NULLify pointer so that next kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() will bail
// out to allocate new page
page_data->page = NULL;
}
And it might be good idea to add 'last_addr' to page_data, so that we know where we stopped
so that the next apply_to_page_range() call could continue, instead of starting from the beginning.
>
>> Whenever kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() will require additional page we could bail out with -EAGAIN,
>> and allocate another one.
>
> When would it be needed? kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte() handles just one page.
>
apply_to_page_range() goes over range of addresses and calls kasan_populate_vmalloc_pte()
multiple times (each time with different 'addr' but the same '*unused' arg). Things will go wrong
if you'll use same page multiple times for different addresses.
> Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists