linux-kernel - Re: [v2][PATCH 4/5] x86/cpu: Move AMD erratum 1386 table over to 'x86_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250409151817.GAZ_aPueHsozDBe0sZ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 17:18:17 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH 4/5] x86/cpu: Move AMD erratum 1386 table over to
 'x86_cpu_id'

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> If I am to tell, the {} is needed, otherwise you touch the array OOB (at
> least with the "m->flags & X86_CPU_ID_FLAG_ENTRY_VALID" test -- if the bit
> is set in the memory, then much more than that...).

Send a patch pls.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette