linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54b74f06.68e1.19618bc860e.Coremail.wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:08:50 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: "Yuquan Wang" <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>
To: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
	rppt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alison.schofield@...el.com,
	rrichter@....com, bfaccini@...dia.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com,
	david@...hat.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, chenbaozi@...tium.com.cn,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	chenhuacai@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk


> [add loongarch folks, cc linux-cxl ]
> 
> kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Yuquan,
> > 
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> > 
> > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> > 
> > url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yuquan-Wang/mm-numa_memblks-introduce-numa_add_reserved_memblk/20250328-172428
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> > patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250328092132.2695299-1-wangyuquan1236%40phytium.com.cn
> > patch subject: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk
> > config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20250328 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250328/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250328/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > 
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/
> > 
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/container_of.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/list.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/module.h:12,
> >                     from drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:10:
> >    drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c: In function 'acpi_parse_cfmws':
> > >> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:461:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_add_reserved_memblk' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >      461 |         if (numa_add_reserved_memblk(node, start, end) < 0) {
> >          |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> So it looks like loongarch was left out of the numa_memblks conversion:
> 87482708210f ("mm: introduce numa_memblks")
> 
> I think the update needed is something like this (untested):
> 
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 2b8bd27a852f..cac16c827159 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
>   select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if MODULES
>   select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
>   select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
> + select NUMA_MEMBLKS
>   select OF
>   select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
>   select PCI
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
> index b5f9de9f102e..bbf9f70bd25f 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -22,20 +22,6 @@ extern int numa_off;
>  extern s16 __cpuid_to_node[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
>  extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
>  
> -struct numa_memblk {
> - u64 start;
> - u64 end;
> - int nid;
> -};
> -
> -#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
> -struct numa_meminfo {
> - int nr_blks;
> - struct numa_memblk blk[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS];
> -};
> -
> -extern int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> -
>  extern void __init early_numa_add_cpu(int cpuid, s16 node);
>  extern void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>  extern void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
> index 84fe7f854820..57b21082e893 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
>  #include <asm/bootinfo.h>
>  #include <asm/loongson.h>
>  #include <asm/numa.h>
> 
> Could someone from the loongarch side propose the fixups needed here so
> Yuquan can land this patch?

Hi, Dan

Should I wait for Loongarch folks's replies or draft a new patch for Loongarch
to introduce numa_memblks according to your suggested code?

Yuquan



信息安全声明：本邮件包含信息归发件人所在组织所有,发件人所在组织对该邮件拥有所有权利。请接收者注意保密,未经发件人书面许可,不得向任何第三方组织和个人透露本邮件所含信息。
Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization.This mail communication is confidential.Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.