[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_bCA8788lrr-NdB@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:52:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000005)
L1d/L1i associativity
* Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de> wrote:
> For the AMD CPUID(4) emulation cache info logic, the same associativity
> mapping array, assocs[], is used for both CPUID(0x80000005) and
> CPUID(0x80000006).
>
> This is incorrect since per the AMD manuals, the mappings for
> CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity is:
>
> n = 0x1 -> 0xfe n
> n = 0xff fully associative
>
> while assocs[] maps these values to:
>
> n = 0x1, 0x2, 0x4 n
> n = 0x3, 0x7, 0x9 0
> n = 0x6 8
> n = 0x8 16
> n = 0xa 32
> n = 0xb 48
> n = 0xc 64
> n = 0xd 96
> n = 0xe 128
> n = 0xf fully associative
>
> which is only valid for CPUID(0x80000006).
>
> Parse CPUID(0x80000005) L1d/L1i associativity values as shown in the AMD
> manuals. Since the 0xffff literal is used to denote full associativity
> at the AMD CPUID(4)-emulation logic, define AMD_CPUID4_FULLY_ASSOCIATIVE
> for it instead of spreading that literal in more places.
>
> Mark the assocs[] mapping array as only valid for CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3
> cache information.
>
> Fixes: a326e948c538 ("x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
Yeah, so a Cc: stable tag is usually reserved for recent regressions,
or critical fixes - but this is a bug from 2009, ~16 years old. This
bug is old enough to receive a driving license in the US, and can
legally buy beer or wine in Germany.
So I've removed the tags from the two commits in tip:x86/cpu, but note
that the Fixes tag itself will give backporters enough information so
they can decide on whether to backport. Greg's -stable process
typically processes all Fixes tags for example, once Linus pulls this
into v6.16-to-be.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists