[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z/bIsT7RT1C7rGYC@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 03:21:21 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
jk@...abs.org, joel@....id.au, eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
andrzej.hajda@...el.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
rfoss@...nel.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
awalls@...metrocast.net, hverkuil@...all.nl,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
louis.peens@...igine.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jdelvare@...e.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, pgaj@...ence.com, hpa@...or.com,
alistair@...ple.id.au, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw, Frank.Li@....com,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] bitops: Change parity8() to parity_odd() with
u64 input and bool return type
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:39:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/9/25 11:25, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:59:14PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:43:44PM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > > > Redesign the parity8() helper as parity_odd(), changing its input type
> > > > from u8 to u64 to support broader use cases and its return type from
> > > > int to bool to clearly reflect the function's binary output. The
> > > > function now returns true for odd parity and false for even parity,
> > > > making its behavior more intuitive based on the name.
> > > >
> > > > Also mark the function with __attribute_const__ to enable better
> > > > compiler optimization, as the result depends solely on its input and
> > > > has no side effects.
> > > >
> > > > While more efficient implementations may exist, further optimization is
> > > > postponed until a use case in performance-critical paths arises.
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c | 4 ++--
> > > > drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/i3c/master/i3c-master-cdns.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c | 2 +-
> > > > include/linux/bitops.h | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> > > > 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c b/arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c
> > > > index 73274d76ce16..86aae4b2bfd5 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c
> > > > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void __init sbf_write(u8 v)
> > > > unsigned long flags;
> > > > if (sbf_port != -1) {
> > > > - if (!parity8(v))
> > > > + if (!parity_odd(v))
>
> What is the benefit of this change all over the place instead of
> adding parity_odd() as new API and keeping the old one (just letting
> it call the new API) ?
>
> A simple
>
> static inline int parity8(u8 val)
> {
> return parity_odd(val);
> }
>
> would have done the trick and be much less invasive.
>
Yury has previously mentioned that adding multiple fixed-type parity
functions increases his maintenance burden. IIUC, he prefers having a
single interface in bitops.h rather than multiple ones.
He were reluctant to add three more functions like:
static inline bool parity16(u16 val)
{
return parity8(val ^ (val >> 8));
}
static inline bool parity32(u32 val)
{
return parity16(val ^ (val >> 16));
}
static inline bool parity64(u64 val)
{
return parity32(val ^ (val >> 32));
}
But instead, we ended up with:
static inline bool parity(u64 val)
{
val ^= val >> 32;
val ^= val >> 16;
val ^= val >> 8;
val ^= val >> 4;
return (0x6996 >> (val & 0xf)) & 1;
}
static inline bool parity8(u8 val)
{
return parity_odd(val);
}
But in the end, we introduced both parity(u64) and parity8(u8), which,
IMHO, might be even more confusing than having consistent fixed-type
helpers.
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists