[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6f7e3436-8ae8-473d-be64-c962366ca5c8@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 21:28:22 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Kees Cook" <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
"Bill Wendling" <morbo@...gle.com>, "Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Remove SANCOV plugin
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 18:19, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 18:02, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> > config KCOV
>> > bool "Code coverage for fuzzing"
>> > depends on ARCH_HAS_KCOV
>> > - depends on CC_HAS_SANCOV_TRACE_PC || GCC_PLUGINS
>> > + depends on CC_HAS_SANCOV_TRACE_PC
>>
>> So this dependency would also disappear. I think either way is fine.
>>
>> The rest of the patch is again identical to my version.
>
> Ah! How about you keep the patch as part of your gcc-8.1 clean up, then?
> That seems more clear, etc.
Sure, I can probably keep that all in a branch of the asm-generic
tree, or alternatively send it through the kbuild tree.
Shall I include the patch to remove the structleak plugin as well?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists