[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <triuq2rqofk4psfauemu6uikizvphnqg7om5x4b6sjc3tjg2a4@5fvv5l4kollo>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:58:16 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] dt-bindings: mfd: gpio: Add MAX7360
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:55:48PM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for Maxim Integrated MAX7360 device with
> support for keypad, rotary, gpios and pwm functionalities.
>
> +
> + i2c {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + io-expander@38 {
> + compatible = "maxim,max7360";
> + reg = <0x38>;
> +
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> + interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> + <24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> + interrupt-names = "inti", "intk";
> +
> + keypad,num-rows = <8>;
> + keypad,num-columns = <4>;
> + linux,keymap = <
> + MATRIX_KEY(0x00, 0x00, KEY_F5)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0x01, 0x00, KEY_F4)
> + MATRIX_KEY(0x02, 0x01, KEY_F6)
> + >;
> + keypad-debounce-delay-ms = <10>;
> + autorepeat;
> +
> + rotary-debounce-delay-ms = <2>;
> + linux,axis = <0>; /* REL_X */
Probably this has been already discussed, but shouldn't keyboard and
rotary encoder be represented as sub-nodes here, similar to how GPIO
block is represented?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists