[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23dec5fd-5abc-40f9-9b13-0f873ffc4242@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 11:10:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Michael Rubin <matchstick@...erthere.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dpenkler@...il.com,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v1 01/21] staging: gpib: Using struct
gpib_board_type_ioctl
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:58:43AM +0000, Michael Rubin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h b/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
> index 6202865278ea..4ddcbc2a81b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/uapi/gpib_ioctl.h
> @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
>
> #define GPIB_CODE 160
>
> -typedef struct {
> +struct gpib_board_type_ioctl {
> char name[100];
> -} board_type_ioctl_t;
> +};
This breaks user API so now user space can't compile. I don't think
any of these 21 patches can be applied.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists