[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_XOr4Ak4S0EOdrw@archie.me>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:34:39 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>,
Alex Markuze <amarkuze@...hat.com>, Timothy Day <timday@...zon.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Update main API document
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:09:57PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> + * For writeback, it is unknown how much there will be to write until the
"... will be written ..."
> + pagecache is walked, so no limit is set by the library.
> <snipped>...
> +Further, if a read from the cache fails, the library will ask the filesystem to
> +do the read instead, renegotiating and retiling the subrequests as necessary.
Read from the filesystem itself or direct read?
> +When writeback occurs, folios that are so marked will only be written to the
> +cache and not to the server. Writeback handles mixed cache-only writes and
> +server-and-cache writes by using two streams, sending one to the cache and one
> +to the server. The server stream will have gaps in it corresponding to those
"... and another to the server."
> +folios.
> +
> <snipped>...
> +Netfslib will pin resources on an inode for future writeback (such as pinning
> +use of an fscache cookie) when an inode is dirtied. However, this needs
> +managing. Firstly, a function is provided to unpin the writeback in
inode management?
> +``->write_inode()``::
>
> <snipped>...
> +The fields generally of interest to a filesystem are::
>
> struct netfs_io_request {
> + enum netfs_io_origin origin;
> struct inode *inode;
> struct address_space *mapping;
> - struct netfs_cache_resources cache_resources;
> + struct netfs_group *group;
> + struct netfs_io_stream io_streams[];
> void *netfs_priv;
> - loff_t start;
> - size_t len;
> - loff_t i_size;
> - const struct netfs_request_ops *netfs_ops;
> + void *netfs_priv2;
> + unsigned long long start;
> + unsigned long long len;
> + unsigned long long i_size;
> unsigned int debug_id;
> + unsigned long flags;
> ...
> };
>
> -The above fields are the ones the netfs can use. They are:
> +They are:
"These fields are, in detail:"
> <snipped>...
> +The stream struct looks like::
"The stream struct is defined as::"
> +
> + struct netfs_io_stream {
> + unsigned char stream_nr;
> + bool avail;
> + size_t sreq_max_len;
> + unsigned int sreq_max_segs;
> + unsigned int submit_extendable_to;
> + ...
> + };
> +
> <snipped>...
> +The table starts with a pair of optional pointers to memory pools from which
> +requests and subrequests can be allocated. If these are not given, netfslib
> +has default pools that it will use. If the filesystem wraps the netfs structs
"... it will use instead."
> +in its own larger structs, then it will need to use its own pools. Netfslib
> +will allocate directly from the pools.
>
> <snipped>...
> + This is not permitted to return an error. In the event of failure,
> + ``netfs_prepare_write_failed()`` must be called.
"This method is not permitted to return an error. Instead, in the event of
failure, ..."
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists