[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250409014136.2816971-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:41:36 -0400
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
x86@...nel.org,
Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@...ia.fr>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] RISC-V: KVM: switch to kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus
use kvm_lock/unlock_all_vcpus instead of riscv's own
implementation.
Note that this does introduce a slight functional change - now vCPUs are
unlocked in the same order they were locked and not in the opposite order.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
---
arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c | 34 ++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
index 39cd26af5a69..a4599de98c6b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c
@@ -12,36 +12,6 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-static void unlock_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_lock_idx)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
-
- for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) {
- tmp_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
- mutex_unlock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex);
- }
-}
-
-static void unlock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- unlock_vcpus(kvm, atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) - 1);
-}
-
-static bool lock_all_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *tmp_vcpu;
- unsigned long c;
-
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!mutex_trylock(&tmp_vcpu->mutex)) {
- unlock_vcpus(kvm, c - 1);
- return false;
- }
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
{
int ret;
@@ -53,7 +23,7 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
return -EEXIST;
ret = -EBUSY;
- if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm))
+ if (kvm_lock_all_vcpus(kvm, true))
return ret;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
@@ -65,7 +35,7 @@ static int aia_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
kvm->arch.aia.in_kernel = true;
out_unlock:
- unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
+ kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
return ret;
}
--
2.26.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists