lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250409105429.1048199-3-darwi@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed,  9 Apr 2025 12:54:25 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3 associativity

Complete the AMD CPUID(4) emulation logic, which uses CPUID(0x80000006)
for L2/L3 cache info and an assocs[] associativity mapping array, by
adding entries for 3-way caches and 6-way caches.

Properly handle the case where CPUID(0x80000006) returns an L2/L3
associativity of 9.  This is not real associativity, but a marker to
indicate that the respective L2/L3 cache information should be retrieved
from CPUID(0x8000001d) instead.  If such a marker is encountered, return
early from legacy_amd_cpuid4(), thus effectively emulating an "invalid
index" CPUID(4) response with a cache type of zero.

When checking if CPUID(0x80000006) L2/L3 cache info output is valid, and
given the associtivity marker 9 above, do not just check if the whole
ECX/EDX register is zero.  Rather, check if the associativity is zero or
9.  An associativity of zero implies no L2/L3 cache, which make it the
more correct check anyway vs. a zero check of the whole output register.

Fixes: a326e948c538 ("x86, cacheinfo: Fixup L3 cache information for AMD multi-node processors")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index 7a95e1ce73f8..038f819da20e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -208,13 +208,20 @@ union l3_cache {
 	unsigned val;
 };
 
+/*
+ * AMD_L2_L3_INVALID_ASSOC: Cache info for the respective L2/L3 cache should
+ * be determined from CPUID(0x8000001d) instead of CPUID(0x80000006).
+ */
 #define AMD_CPUID4_FULLY_ASSOCIATIVE	0xffff
+#define AMD_L2_L3_INVALID_ASSOC		0x9
 
 /* L2/L3 associativity mapping */
 static const unsigned short assocs[] = {
 	[1] = 1,
 	[2] = 2,
+	[3] = 3,
 	[4] = 4,
+	[5] = 6,
 	[6] = 8,
 	[8] = 16,
 	[0xa] = 32,
@@ -267,7 +274,7 @@ amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
 		size_in_kb = l1->size_in_kb;
 		break;
 	case 2:
-		if (!l2.val)
+		if (!l2.assoc || l2.assoc == AMD_L2_L3_INVALID_ASSOC)
 			return;
 		assoc = assocs[l2.assoc];
 		line_size = l2.line_size;
@@ -276,7 +283,7 @@ amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
 		size_in_kb = __this_cpu_read(cpu_info.x86_cache_size);
 		break;
 	case 3:
-		if (!l3.val)
+		if (!l3.assoc || l3.assoc == AMD_L2_L3_INVALID_ASSOC)
 			return;
 		assoc = assocs[l3.assoc];
 		line_size = l3.line_size;
-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ