linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250409-incredible-attentive-scorpion-fa9def@sudeepholla>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:14:00 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for
 scmi cpufreq

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:50:29AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sudeep, Cristian
> 
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:23:27PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 11:28:52AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:52:23AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:23:12AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:12:45AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > So it is clear that wrong fw_devlink is created, it is because scmi cpufreq device is
> >>> > > created earlier and when device_add, the below logic makes the fwnode pointer points
> >>> > > to scmi cpufreq device.
> >>> > >         if (dev->fwnode && !dev->fwnode->dev) {
> >>> > >                 dev->fwnode->dev = dev;
> >>> > >                 fw_devlink_link_device(dev);
> >>> > >         }
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks, looks like simple way to reproduce the issue. I will give it a try.
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >>> I could reproduce but none of my solution solved the problem completely
> >>> or properly. And I don't like the DT proposal you came up with. I am
> >>> not inclined to just drop this fwnode setting in the scmi devices and
> >>> just use of_node.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Sorry for the typo that changes the meaning: s/not/now
> >>
> >>I meant "I am now inclined ..", until we figure out a way to make this
> >>work with devlinks properly.
> >
> >when you have time, please give a look at
> >https://github.com/MrVan/linux/commit/b500c29cb7f6f32a38b1ed462e333db5a3e301e4
> >
> >The upper patch was to follow Cristian's and Dan's suggestion in V2[1] to use
> >a flag SCMI_DEVICE_NO_FWNODE for scmi device.
> >
> >I could post out the upper patch as V3 if it basically looks no design flaw.
> >I will drop the pinctrl patch in v3, considering we are first going
> >to resolve the fw_devlink issue for cpufreq/devfreq.
> >
> >[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z6SgFGb4Z88v783c@pluto/
> 
> Not sure you gave a look on this or not. I am thinking to bring this V3
> out to mailing list later this week. Please raise if you have any concern.
> 

Yes I had some thoughts. I will take a look and refresh my memories first.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep