[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250410152935.25ba7255@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:29:35 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nd@....com, Steven Price
<steven.price@....com>, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Maarten
Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/panthor: Use 64-bit and poll register
accessors
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:07:20 +0100
Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@....com> wrote:
> On 21/03/2025 07:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:34 +0000
> > Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@....com> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch updates Panthor to use the new 64-bit accessors and poll
> >> functions.
> >
> > nit: I don't think it makes sense to dissociate the introduction of the
> > new helpers and their use. Could we squash this patch into the previous
> > one?
>
> It was previously requested that I split the patches into two to ease
> review. I can merge it back into the previous one in v3.
Thanks. Could we also have that submitted in a separate patch, so we
can merge it while we're discussing the rest of the patch series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists