[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32c7a1e6-37fa-4d40-b09f-93712a69f062@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:24:26 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adityag@...ux.ibm.com, donettom@...ux.ibm.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base/memory: Avoid overhead from
for_each_present_section_nr()
On 10.04.25 15:55, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 03:18:00PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Staring at the end result and the particularly long comment, are we now
>> really any better than before 61659efdb35c?
>
> I think we are.
I think you are right. The whole comment can IMHO be heavily simplified.
Makes it sound more complicated that it actually is ...
/*
* Create memory blocks to span all present memory sections. Take care
* of memory blocks that span multiple sections.
*/
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists