[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_fo9hPpSfpwi5Jn@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:51:18 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux.dev" <virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Yong He <alexyonghe@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] irqbypass: Take ownership of producer/consumer token tracking
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, Kevin Tian wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > +int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *consumer,
> > + struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd)
> > {
> > struct irq_bypass_consumer *tmp;
> > struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (!consumer->token ||
> > - !consumer->add_producer || !consumer->del_producer)
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(consumer->token))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!consumer->add_producer || !consumer->del_producer)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&lock);
> >
> > list_for_each_entry(tmp, &consumers, node) {
> > - if (tmp->token == consumer->token || tmp == consumer) {
> > + if (tmp->token == eventfd || tmp == consumer) {
> > ret = -EBUSY;
> > goto out_err;
> > }
> > }
>
> the 2nd check 'tmp == consumer' is redundant. If they are equal
> consumer->token is not NULL then the earlier WARN_ON will be
> triggered already.
Oh, nice. Good catch! That check subtly gets dropped on the conversion to
xarray, so it definitely makes sense to remove it in this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists