linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v14 06/16] net: mdio: regmap: prepare support for multiple valid addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67f7feab.df0a0220.40a6f.c911@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:23:53 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
	"Chester A. Unal" <chester.a.unal@...nc9.com>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v14 06/16] net: mdio: regmap: prepare support
 for multiple valid addr

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:18:02PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:51:13AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Rework the valid_addr and convert it to a mask in preparation for mdio
> > regmap to support multiple valid addr in the case the regmap can support
> > it.
> 
> I think it would be good to pull these MDIO regmap patches out into a
> series of their own. We know there is a user, so i'm happy for us the
> accept it without that user. But this code needs further discusion,
> which will be irrelevant for the switch.
>

Ok so how you would like to proceed for the remaining patch? Repost as RFC?

Still waiting feedback for nvmem and mfd so I would love to get feedback
for them (that are also irrelevant to the switch)

-- 
	Ansuel