linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 17/36] Documentation/x86: Document the new attack vector controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fkl2b3ymatulazt2xjegubqcejx5bgaraktztpkitodrbbsozw@xrskej3fg3jf>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:14:38 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, Derek Manwaring <derekmn@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/36] Documentation/x86: Document the new attack
 vector controls

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:40:04AM -0500, David Kaplan wrote:
> +=============== ============== ============ ============= ============== ============
> +Vulnerability   User-to-Kernel User-to-User Guest-to-Host Guest-to-Guest Cross-Thread
> +=============== ============== ============ ============= ============== ============
> +BHI                   X                           X
> +GDS                   X              X            X              X        (Note 1)
> +L1TF                  X                           X                       (Note 2)
> +MDS                   X              X            X              X        (Note 2)
> +MMIO                  X              X            X              X        (Note 2)
> +Meltdown              X
> +Retbleed              X                           X                       (Note 3)
> +RFDS                  X              X            X              X
> +Spectre_v1            X
> +Spectre_v2            X                           X
> +Spectre_v2_user                      X                           X        (Note 1)
> +SRBDS                 X              X            X              X
> +SRSO                  X                           X
> +SSB (Note 4)

Any reason not to put the "Note 4" in the same column as the others?

-- 
Josh