[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1744312662-356571-8-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 22:17:37 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Andrew
Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
CC: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, "Saeed
Mahameed" <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq
Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Moshe Shemesh
<moshe@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Vlad Dogaru
<vdogaru@...dia.com>, Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>, Michal Kubiak
<michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 07/12] net/mlx5: HWS, Fix pool size optimization
From: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@...dia.com>
The optimization to create a size-one STE range for the unused direction
was broken. The hardware prevents us from creating RTCs over unallocated
STE space, so the only reason this has worked so far is because the
optimization was never used.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/pool.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/pool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/pool.c
index 26d85fe3c417..7e37d6e9eb83 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/pool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/pool.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int hws_pool_resource_alloc(struct mlx5hws_pool *pool)
u32 fw_ft_type, opt_log_range;
fw_ft_type = mlx5hws_table_get_res_fw_ft_type(pool->tbl_type, false);
- opt_log_range = pool->opt_type == MLX5HWS_POOL_OPTIMIZE_ORIG ?
+ opt_log_range = pool->opt_type == MLX5HWS_POOL_OPTIMIZE_MIRROR ?
0 : pool->alloc_log_sz;
resource = hws_pool_create_one_resource(pool, opt_log_range, fw_ft_type);
if (!resource) {
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int hws_pool_resource_alloc(struct mlx5hws_pool *pool)
struct mlx5hws_pool_resource *mirror_resource;
fw_ft_type = mlx5hws_table_get_res_fw_ft_type(pool->tbl_type, true);
- opt_log_range = pool->opt_type == MLX5HWS_POOL_OPTIMIZE_MIRROR ?
+ opt_log_range = pool->opt_type == MLX5HWS_POOL_OPTIMIZE_ORIG ?
0 : pool->alloc_log_sz;
mirror_resource = hws_pool_create_one_resource(pool, opt_log_range, fw_ft_type);
if (!mirror_resource) {
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists