[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f509da3d-71de-4b90-b13b-ef0584bf05b8@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:28:47 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: Fix use of undeclared identifier
'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops'
On 4/10/2025 7:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:35 PM Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>>
>> `pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops` is hidden under both `CONFIG_ACPI` and
>> `CONFIG_PM_SLEEP` so the functions that use it need the same scope.
>
> Shouldn't this be CONFIG_SUSPEND given what's going on in acpi.h?
Really - I think we probably should change all of pinctrl-amd.c to use
CONFIG_SUSPEND.
>
> Also, there is one more report regarding pinctrl_dev being unused:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/202504101106.hPCEcoHr-lkp@intel.com/T/#u
>
> Any chance to address all of this in one patch?
Sure; I'll spin again and get something out to cover both cases soon.
>
>> Adjust checks to look for both.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504100420.88UPkUTU-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> index b6fafed79b289..472a5aed4cd05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static int amd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio_dev);
>> acpi_register_wakeup_handler(gpio_dev->irq, amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
>> acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
>> #endif
>>
>> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static void amd_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> gpiochip_remove(&gpio_dev->gc);
>> acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
>> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
>> #endif
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists