[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_hTI8ywa3rTxFaz@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:24:19 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
alexey.amakhalov@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
luto@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 10/15] KVM: VMX: Use WRMSRNS or its immediate form
when available
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index e6134ef2263d..04244c3ba374 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -1226,4 +1226,10 @@
> * a #GP
> */
>
> +/* Instruction opcode for WRMSRNS supported in binutils >= 2.40 */
> +#define ASM_WRMSRNS _ASM_BYTES(0x0f,0x01,0xc6)
> +
> +/* Instruction opcode for the immediate form RDMSR/WRMSRNS */
> +#define ASM_WRMSRNS_RAX _ASM_BYTES(0xc4,0xe7,0x7a,0xf6,0xc0)
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_MSR_INDEX_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> index f6986dee6f8c..9fae43723c44 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> @@ -64,6 +64,29 @@
> RET
> .endm
>
> +/*
> + * Write EAX to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL.
> + *
> + * Choose the best WRMSR instruction based on availability.
> + *
> + * Replace with 'wrmsrns' and 'wrmsrns %rax, $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL' once binutils support them.
> + */
> +.macro WRITE_EAX_TO_MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL
> + ALTERNATIVE_2 __stringify(mov $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, %ecx; \
> + xor %edx, %edx; \
> + mov %edi, %eax; \
> + ds wrmsr), \
> + __stringify(mov $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, %ecx; \
> + xor %edx, %edx; \
> + mov %edi, %eax; \
> + ASM_WRMSRNS), \
> + X86_FEATURE_WRMSRNS, \
> + __stringify(xor %_ASM_AX, %_ASM_AX; \
> + mov %edi, %eax; \
> + ASM_WRMSRNS_RAX; .long MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL), \
> + X86_FEATURE_MSR_IMM
> +.endm
This is quite hideous. I have no objection to optimizing __vmx_vcpu_run(), but
I would much prefer that a macro like this live in generic code, and that it be
generic. It should be easy enough to provide an assembly friendly equivalent to
__native_wrmsr_constant().
> +
> .section .noinstr.text, "ax"
>
> /**
> @@ -123,10 +146,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
> movl PER_CPU_VAR(x86_spec_ctrl_current), %esi
> cmp %edi, %esi
> je .Lspec_ctrl_done
> - mov $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, %ecx
> - xor %edx, %edx
> - mov %edi, %eax
> - wrmsr
> + WRITE_EAX_TO_MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL
>
> .Lspec_ctrl_done:
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists