[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_dc0h-EI5RWtIK2@lx-t490>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 07:53:22 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cacheinfo: Properly parse CPUID(0x80000005)
L1d/L1i associativity
On Wed, 09 Apr 2025, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Yeah, so a Cc: stable tag is usually reserved for recent regressions,
> or critical fixes - but this is a bug from 2009, ~16 years old. This
> bug is old enough to receive a driving license in the US, and can
> legally buy beer or wine in Germany.
>
Haha, noted :)
> So I've removed the tags from the two commits in tip:x86/cpu, but note
> that the Fixes tag itself will give backporters enough information so
> they can decide on whether to backport. Greg's -stable process
> typically processes all Fixes tags for example, once Linus pulls this
> into v6.16-to-be.
Yup, makes sense.
Thanks a lot for all the support!
Ahmed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists