lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <057db64d-04de-45fd-b1e6-ede46fa6923a@icloud.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:50:49 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 horms@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
 willemb@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sock: Correct error checking condition for
 assign|release_proto_idx()

On 2025/4/9 02:21, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 8daf1b3b12c607d81920682139b53fee935c9bb5..9ece93a3dd044997276b0fa37dddc7b5bbdacc43 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -1421,7 +1421,10 @@ struct prot_inuse {
>>  static inline void sock_prot_inuse_add(const struct net *net,
>>  				       const struct proto *prot, int val)
>>  {
>> -	this_cpu_add(net->core.prot_inuse->val[prot->inuse_idx], val);
>> +	unsigned int idx = prot->inuse_idx;
>> +
>> +	if (likely(idx < PROTO_INUSE_NR))
>> +		this_cpu_add(net->core.prot_inuse->val[idx], val);
> How does the else case happen ?

thank you for code review.

provided that @prot->inuse_idx will never be used if @prot fails to be
registered.

will remove this check in v2.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ