[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd5308eb-57a3-4484-8be6-b41ee30233ae@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:27:34 +0200
From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/ivpu: Add handling of
VPU_JSM_STATUS_MVNCI_CONTEXT_VIOLATION_HW
Hi,
On 4/10/2025 10:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:49:37AM +0200, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an important patch for the Intel NPU.
>> Is there anything it is missing to be included in stable?
>
> Patience, you only sent this:
>
>> On 4/8/2025 11:57 AM, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
>
> 2 days ago, AFTER the latest of -rc releases was sent out for review,
> and those kernels have NOT even been released yet!
>
> [rant about how you all know this process works deleted as it was
> just snarky on my side, although quite cathartic, thanks for letting me
> vent...]
>
> Relax, it will get handled when we can get to it. To help out, please
> take the time to review pending stable backported patches that have been
> submitted to the mailing list ahead of yours.
Yeah, sorry about that. It seems I'm still learning the art of patience in the kernel processes.
I didn't mean to rush anything. I was just worried my patch might have been overlooked due to a typo or a wrong commit message tag.
I'll make sure to review the backported patches in the meantime.
And thanks for holding back on the rant. I really think that the standard set by Linus is not healthy.
Regards,
Jacek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists