lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd5308eb-57a3-4484-8be6-b41ee30233ae@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:27:34 +0200
From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/ivpu: Add handling of
 VPU_JSM_STATUS_MVNCI_CONTEXT_VIOLATION_HW

Hi,

On 4/10/2025 10:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:49:37AM +0200, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an important patch for the Intel NPU.
>> Is there anything it is missing to be included in stable?
> 
> Patience, you only sent this:
> 
>> On 4/8/2025 11:57 AM, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
> 
> 2 days ago, AFTER the latest of -rc releases was sent out for review,
> and those kernels have NOT even been released yet!
> 
> [rant about how you all know this process works deleted as it was
>  just snarky on my side, although quite cathartic, thanks for letting me
>  vent...]
> 
> Relax, it will get handled when we can get to it.  To help out, please
> take the time to review pending stable backported patches that have been
> submitted to the mailing list ahead of yours.

Yeah, sorry about that. It seems I'm still learning the art of patience in the kernel processes.
I didn't mean to rush anything. I was just worried my patch might have been overlooked due to a typo or a wrong commit message tag.

I'll make sure to review the backported patches in the meantime.

And thanks for holding back on the rant. I really think that the standard set by Linus is not healthy.

Regards,
Jacek


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ