lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <SEZPR06MB52695564F5DE73356D0EFF06E8B72@SEZPR06MB5269.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:11:11 +0000
From: 李扬韬 <frank.li@...o.com>
To: "dsterba@...e.cz" <dsterba@...e.cz>
CC: "clm@...com" <clm@...com>, "josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
	"dsterba@...e.com" <dsterba@...e.com>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject:
 回复: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: convert to spinlock guards in btrfs_update_ioctl_balance_args()

> Please don't do the guard() conversions in fs/btrfs/, the explicit locking is the preferred style. If other subsystems use the scoped locking guards then let them do it.

OK, is there anything we can do quickly in the btrfs code currently?

Thx,
Yangtao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ