linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: Use strscpy()/scnprintf() with acpi_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174437424256.3859.4771813935553634203.b4-ty@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:24:02 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>, 
 "Luke D. Jones" <luke@...nes.dev>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, 
 Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@...il.com>, Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>, 
 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>, 
 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...onical.com>, 
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, 
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: Use strscpy()/scnprintf() with
 acpi_device_name/class()

On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:08:38 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> Replace strcpy() and sprintf() for acpi_device_name/class() targets
> with safer variant. In one case, scnprintf() is necessary but the
> rest can use strscpy().
> 
> 

Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86: Use strscpy()/scnprintf() with acpi_device_name/class()
      commit: 8625c4c06a79ddddcc53ead898bf721cee618e4e

--
 i.