[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159f1df0-6c7e-40a5-9c62-ef6ebcb189ba@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:47:38 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...aro.org>, Hans Verkuil
<hverkuil@...all.nl>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] media: iris: Avoid updating frame size to firmware
during reconfig
On 08/04/2025 16:54, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> During reconfig, the firmware sends the resolution aligned to 8 bytes.
> If the driver sends the same resolution back to the firmware the resolution
> will be aligned to 16 bytes not 8.
>
> The alignment mismatch would then subsequently cause the firmware to
> send another redundant sequence change.
>
> Fix this by not setting the resolution property during reconfig.
The log implies to me a missing Fixes: tag
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists