[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D93TIWHR8EZM.25205EFWBLJLM@proton.me>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:45:51 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: fix building firmware abstraction on 32bit arm
On Fri Apr 11, 2025 at 9:14 AM CEST, Christian Schrefl wrote:
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/firmware.rs b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> index f04b058b09b2d2397e26344d0e055b3aa5061432..1d6284316f2a4652ef3f76272670e5e29b0ff924 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> @@ -5,14 +5,18 @@
> //! C header: [`include/linux/firmware.h`](srctree/include/linux/firmware.h)
>
> use crate::{bindings, device::Device, error::Error, error::Result, str::CStr};
> -use core::ptr::NonNull;
> +use core::{ffi, ptr::NonNull};
Ah I overlooked this, you should be using `kernel::ffi` (or
`crate::ffi`) instead of `core`. (for `c_char` it doesn't matter, but we
shouldn't be using `core::ffi`, since we have our own mappings).
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists