linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v38 00/31] Introduce QC USB SND audio offloading support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025041152-eternal-harmonize-d608@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:54:32 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
	mathias.nyman@...el.com, perex@...ex.cz, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, corbet@....net, broonie@...nel.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
	tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 00/31] Introduce QC USB SND audio offloading support

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> > > > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next.
> > > 
> > > let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes...
> > 
> > All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now.
> > 
> > Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever"
> > of a patch series award.
> > 
> 
> I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the
> comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series
> wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes
> and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel
> like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit
> message is also misleading now.

I think a fixup is probably sufficient, especially as I can't rebase my
tree, and reverting all of these is just a mess.

thanks,

greg k-h