[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250411-work-pidfs-enoent-v2-1-60b2d3bb545f@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:22:44 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>, Mike Yuan <me@...dnzj.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Ziljstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] exit: move wake_up_all() pidfd waiters into
__unhash_process()
Move the pidfd notification out of __change_pid() and into
__unhash_process(). The only valid call to __change_pid() with a NULL
argument and PIDTYPE_PID is from __unhash_process(). This is a lot more
obvious than calling it from __change_pid().
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
---
kernel/exit.c | 5 +++++
kernel/pid.c | 5 -----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 1b51dc099f1e..abcd93ce4e18 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -133,8 +133,13 @@ struct release_task_post {
static void __unhash_process(struct release_task_post *post, struct task_struct *p,
bool group_dead)
{
+ struct pid *pid = task_pid(p);
+
nr_threads--;
+
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ wake_up_all(&pid->wait_pidfd);
+
if (group_dead) {
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 4ac2ce46817f..26f1e136f017 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -359,11 +359,6 @@ static void __change_pid(struct pid **pids, struct task_struct *task,
hlist_del_rcu(&task->pid_links[type]);
*pid_ptr = new;
- if (type == PIDTYPE_PID) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID));
- wake_up_all(&pid->wait_pidfd);
- }
-
for (tmp = PIDTYPE_MAX; --tmp >= 0; )
if (pid_has_task(pid, tmp))
return;
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists