[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250411160352.GB5675@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:03:53 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robin.murphy@....com,
nicolinc@...dia.com, jsnitsel@...hat.com, praan@...gle.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, ddutile@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add missing S2FWB feature detection
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:09:19AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:03:51AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> > Commit 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> > introduced S2FWB usage but omitted the corresponding feature detection.
> > As a result, vIOMMU allocation fails on FVP in arm_vsmmu_alloc(), due to
> > the following check:
> >
> > if (!arm_smmu_master_canwbs(master) &&
> > !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB))
> > return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> >
> > This patch adds the missing detection logic to prevent allocation
> > failure when S2FWB is supported.
> >
> > Fixes: 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
>
> This should go to rc
Yup. I'll pick this up next week along with any other SMMU fixes kicking
around.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists