[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a7d427c-c729-47c7-b851-9c49a30af279@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:13:43 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: Allocate frozen pages in
alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio
On 11.04.25 16:21, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 03:44:31PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> I assume htlb_alloc_mask() will always include _GFP_COMP.
>
> static inline gfp_t htlb_alloc_mask(struct hstate *h)
> {
> gfp_t gfp = __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN;
>
I checked that as well and actually meant to say the I assume that we
will here always have __GFP_COMP because the gfp_mask we get here will
always be derived from htlb_alloc_mask().
>> But semantically, it might be wrong: __folio_alloc() will in the memdesc
>> world also make sure to allocate the memdesc, __alloc_frozen_pages() not.
>>
>> Maybe one would want a __alloc_frozen_folio() .... @willy?
>
> This is fine. Yes, it'll need to be modified when we get to the
> separately allocated memdesc, but there's a number of places that
> cast the freshly allocated page to a folio, and I'll have to come up
> with a way to catch them all.
Okay, thanks for clarifying.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists